Food companies raise concerns as FSSAI red hexagonal warning labels may be linked to non-vegetarian food identification.
|
Food companies have approached the Supreme Court over FSSAI’s red hexagonal warning labels. They said that using red to identify non-vegetarian products could confuse consumers, especially because red is also commonly used in warnings or danger symbols. The Supreme Court will now consider the legal and labelling concerns related to this issue.
According to the All India Food Processors Association (AIFPA), the red colour could create confusion because consumers commonly associate it with non-vegetarian food identification.
Food companies have raised concerns over the proposed red colour. They argue that using red colour for the warning label could confuse consumers, because, in India, red is also associated with non-vegetarian food identification. The All India Food Processors Association (AIFPA) highlighted this concern before the Supreme Court.
An industry group has also raised concerns about how consumers may interpret the proposed warning symbol. Since colour is commonly used to identify food categories in India, the industry fears that the red label could distract from its intended purpose of highlighting nutritional concerns. The concern is that consumers may focus on the colour rather than the health information the label is meant to communicate.
“Red is for non-vegetarian and green is for vegetarian. So instead of red, if some other colour can be used for a warning label in case of ultra-processed food items,” said Advocate Shadan Farasat.
The main focus of this dispute is FSSAI’s proposed food labelling requirements, which call for nutritional warnings to be displayed prominently on packaged food products. Industry groups are specifically concerned about the proposed red hexagonal warning label. They say that the red colour may remind consumers of the non-vegetarian food symbol, which could make the nutritional warning less clear. Therefore, the industry has asked for clarification and reconsideration of the label’s colour and design.
This means the Supreme Court is looking into concerns about the colour and design of FSSAI’s proposed warning label. The Court may also consider whether the proposed label clearly communicates the nutritional warning and whether its design could confuse consumers.
Business Honor observes that the dispute highlights the need for food warning labels to be clear and easily understood by consumers.
FAQs
What are FSSAI’s red hexagonal warning labels?
They are proposed front-of-pack labels designed to highlight nutritional concerns in packaged food products.
Why are food companies opposing the red colour?
Industry groups argue that red may be associated with non-vegetarian food identification and could confuse consumers.
Who raised concerns over the warning label colour?
The All India Food Processors Association (AIFPA) has raised concerns about the proposed red warning label.
What is the main issue before the Supreme Court?
The case involves concerns over the colour and design of FSSAI’s proposed nutritional warning labels.
Why is the label design important?
A clear design can help consumers understand nutritional warnings without confusing them with other food identification symbols.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
Comments
0 Comments